Which approach should be avoided that would undermine the peers' agenda?

Which approach should be avoided that would undermine the peers' agenda?

• A. Peers' agenda first
• B. Shared agenda
• C. Own agenda ahead of my peers' agenda
• D. No agenda

Answer: (C)

Putting your own priorities ahead of the peer’s agenda would undermine their autonomy and recovery process. A CPRS is there to support the peer by aligning with their goals, helping them articulate what they want to achieve, and co-creating a plan. When you push your own agenda first, you take control of the conversation, which can erode trust, reduce engagement, and make the peer feel disempowered. The strongest approach is to center the peer’s agenda and, when possible, work toward a shared plan that reflects their goals. Starting with the peer’s stated aims demonstrates respect and fosters collaborative decision-making, which is essential in recovery support. A no-agenda stance can be less effective for making progress but doesn’t inherently undermine the peer’s goals if it still centers their priorities.

Putting your own priorities ahead of the peer’s agenda would undermine their autonomy and recovery process. A CPRS is there to support the peer by aligning with their goals, helping them articulate what they want to achieve, and co-creating a plan. When you push your own agenda first, you take control of the conversation, which can erode trust, reduce engagement, and make the peer feel disempowered. The strongest approach is to center the peer’s agenda and, when possible, work toward a shared plan that reflects their goals. Starting with the peer’s stated aims demonstrates respect and fosters collaborative decision-making, which is essential in recovery support. A no-agenda stance can be less effective for making progress but doesn’t inherently undermine the peer’s goals if it still centers their priorities.